Lecture 02 — How to Think Like a Multimodal System Designer

~3–4 hours (core system-design lecture)


🌍 Why This Lecture Matters

Most people learn:

  • 📦 APIs
  • 🧩 libraries
  • ⚙️ frameworks

Very few learn:

How to design an intelligent system from first principles.

This lecture transforms you from:

model usermultimodal system architect


🧠 The Architect’s Mindset

A multimodal architect does not ask first:

❌ “Which model should I use?”

They ask:

✅ What problem am I solving?
✅ What information is available?
✅ What modality carries the signal?
✅ What errors are acceptable?


🏗️ First Principle #1: Start From the Task, Not the Model

Every intelligent system begins with a task definition.

Ask These Questions (Always)

  1. What is the input?
  2. What is the output?
  3. What transformation is required?
  4. What failure is unacceptable?

Example

Task: Medical image diagnosis

Aspect Decision
Input Image + text report
Output Text explanation
Risk False negative
Requirement Human-in-the-loop

🧪 Knowledge Check — Task Thinking

Q1 (Objective)

Why should task definition come before model selection?

Answer

Because architecture depends on constraints, risk, and signal — not tools.


🧠 First Principle #2: Modalities Are Information Channels

Each modality has strengths and weaknesses.

Modality Strength Weakness
Text Reasoning No raw perception
Image Spatial No abstraction
Audio Emotion, tone Noise
Video Time Cost & complexity

Good design uses the minimum modality required.


❌ Over-Engineering Trap (Very Common)

Many beginners think:

“More modalities = smarter AI”

Reality:

More modalities = more noise, cost, and failure modes


🧪 Knowledge Check — Modalities

Q2 (MCQ)

Which modality is the most expensive to annotate?

A) Text
B) Image
C) Audio
D) Video

Correct Answer

D) Video


🧠 First Principle #3: Separate Perception from Reasoning

One of the most important design rules.

Correct Separation


Perception → Representation → Reasoning → Action

  • Perception = encoders
  • Reasoning = LLM
  • Action = output or tool use

Why This Matters

If you mix everything:

  • debugging becomes impossible
  • errors propagate
  • evaluation is unclear

Clean boundaries create reliable systems.


🧪 Knowledge Check — Architecture

Q3 (True / False)

Vision models should handle logical reasoning.

Answer

False.


🧠 First Principle #4: Alignment Is the Bottleneck

Alignment answers:

How does non-language data become “thinkable”?

Bad alignment →

  • hallucinations
  • irrelevant answers
  • false confidence

Good alignment →

  • reasoning
  • grounding
  • generalization

🧩 Alignment Design Choices

Method When to Use
Linear projection Simple tasks
MLP Moderate complexity
Cross-attention High alignment need
Q-Former Vision-language fusion

🧪 Knowledge Check — Alignment

Q4 (MCQ)

Which component most directly affects hallucination?

A) Tokenizer
B) Alignment layer
C) GPU size
D) Dataset size

Correct Answer

B) Alignment layer


🧠 First Principle #5: Think in Pipelines, Not Models

Architects think in pipelines.

Example: Image Question Answering


Image → Vision Encoder
Question → Text Encoder
↓
Alignment
↓
LLM
↓
Answer

Each box is:

  • replaceable
  • testable
  • improvable

🧪 Knowledge Check — Pipeline Thinking

Q5 (Objective)

Why should components be modular?

Answer

To allow debugging, replacement, and independent improvement.


🧠 Beginner → Advanced Design Levels

Level Focus
Beginner Single modality
Intermediate Multimodal fusion
Advanced RAG + tools
Expert Agents + feedback loops

You do not jump levels.


🧠 Case Study 1 — Image Captioning

Design Decision

Choice Reason
Frozen vision encoder Stability
Small projection Efficiency
Pretrained LLM Reasoning

This works because task complexity is low.


🧠 Case Study 2 — Medical VQA (High Risk)

Changes:

  • HITL required
  • Conservative decoding
  • Explanation mandatory

Risk changes architecture.


🧪 Knowledge Check — Risk Awareness

Q6 (True / False)

The same architecture fits both chatbots and medical diagnosis.

Answer

False.


🧠 First Principle #6: Evaluation Shapes Design

If you can’t measure it:

You can’t trust it.

Evaluation informs:

  • architecture choice
  • data needs
  • alignment method

(We go deep in Lecture 09.)


🧠 Thinking Beyond Accuracy

Architects evaluate:

  • robustness
  • calibration
  • failure modes
  • ethical impact

🧪 Knowledge Check — Evaluation Thinking

Q7 (Objective)

Why is accuracy alone insufficient?

Answer

Because it hides bias, uncertainty, and rare failures.


🧠 Architect’s Checklist (Very Practical)

Before coding, ask:

  • Is this modality necessary?
  • Is language the reasoning layer?
  • Is alignment explicit?
  • Are risks identified?
  • Can humans intervene?

🌱 Human-Centered Design (Core Philosophy)

Multimodal AI should:

  • assist humans
  • explain decisions
  • accept correction

Architects design for humility, not dominance.


🧪 Final Knowledge Check — Reflection

What separates an AI architect from a model user?

System-level thinking, responsibility, and first-principle design.


✅ Final Takeaways

  • Architects start from tasks
  • Modalities are information channels
  • Alignment is critical
  • Pipelines beat monoliths
  • Ethics influence architecture

🌍 Final Reflection

If AI systems fail, who is responsible?

The humans who designed them.


Previous
Next